The book A Companion to Palgraves Golden Treasury was written by author D C David Churchill Somervell Here you can read free online of A Companion to Palgraves Golden Treasury book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is A Companion to Palgraves Golden Treasury a good or bad book?
Where can I read A Companion to Palgraves Golden Treasury for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read A Companion to Palgraves Golden Treasury Online - link to read the book on full screen.
Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book -
Read Book A Companion to Palgraves Golden Treasury
What reading level is A Companion to Palgraves Golden Treasury book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
If so, the less Shakespeare he ! " 366, 368. A SUMMER NIGHT. THE FUTURE. Typical examples of Arnold's rather melancholy musings upon " This strange disease of modern life With its sick hurry and divided aims. " In the first Arnold contrasts the serenity of the moonlit sky with the feverish bustle of modern life, whether it be a life of dull mechanical duties or of wild disastrous adventure. In the second he com- pares life to a river whose upper reaches of the past were clean and pleasant, and ...whose lower reaches of the future may be broad and inspiring. For the present, however, the river of life is passing through its middle reaches, a dull and sordid flat, ringing with the din of industrialism. 367. MORALITY. A magnificent poem in which Arnold rises above the depression of the two lying on either side of it. Never has the idea con- tained in " Labor are est orare" been more splendidly expressed. 1 In the poem oddly called " House. " THE GOLDEN TREASURY 125 371. THE SCHOLAR GIPSY. The facts about the hero of this poem are provided by the poet in his own introductory note, and this is just as well, for the poem is singularly vague in its references.
User Reviews: