A Descriptive Analysis of Nonverbal Status Displays Demonstrated By Dental Educators in Clinical And/or Laboratory Settings
A Descriptive Analysis of Nonverbal Status Displays Demonstrated By Dental Educators in Clinical And/or Laboratory Settings
Maple, Marilyn J
The book A Descriptive Analysis of Nonverbal Status Displays Demonstrated By Dental Educators in Clinical And/or Laboratory Settings was written by author Maple, Marilyn J Here you can read free online of A Descriptive Analysis of Nonverbal Status Displays Demonstrated By Dental Educators in Clinical And/or Laboratory Settings book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is A Descriptive Analysis of Nonverbal Status Displays Demonstrated By Dental Educators in Clinical And/or Laboratory Settings a good or bad book?
What reading level is A Descriptive Analysis of Nonverbal Status Displays Demonstrated By Dental Educators in Clinical And/or Laboratory Settings book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
. while teachers in Group II spent less time on these activities." Re states "Teachers in Group II spent more of their time verbally and nonverbally inhibiting student participation and in this way dominated classroom acti- vities" (Re, 1978, p. 157). Re also notes that there was a difference in the teach- ing patterns of teachers in Group I and Group II. Group I teachers usually began a discussion by asking broad questions which students might answer by expressing themselves in "unanticipated"... answers which served as a catalyst to initiate 58 further student participation. Group II teachers usually began discussion by asking a narrow question with a "predictable" answer. Students responded with the expected answer. Then the teacher asked another narrow question and then "the teacher praises and encourages the students and moves on to another question" (Re, 1978, p. 158). Group I teachers praised the students also but used nonverbal praise more in isolation rather than in concert with verbal praise as compared to the teachers in Group II who used less non- verbal praise.
User Reviews: