A Selection of Cases On the Law of Contracts volume 2
A Selection of Cases On the Law of Contracts volume 2
Samuel Williston
The book A Selection of Cases On the Law of Contracts volume 2 was written by author Samuel Williston Here you can read free online of A Selection of Cases On the Law of Contracts volume 2 book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is A Selection of Cases On the Law of Contracts volume 2 a good or bad book?
What reading level is A Selection of Cases On the Law of Contracts volume 2 book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
Mills, 40 N. Y. 546; Veazey v. Allen, 173 N. Y. 359; Winpenny v. French, 18 (Jhio St. 469 ; Sweeney v. McLeod, 15 Orej;. 330 ; Clippinger v. Kepbaugh, 5 W. & S. 315 ; Spalding v. Ewing, 149 Pa. 375 ; Powers v'. Skinner, 34 Vt. 274 ; Bryan v. Reynolds, 5 Wis. 200 ; Chippewa Valley Co. V. Chicago, &c. Co. , 75 Wis. 224 ; Iloulton v. Nichol, 93 Wis. 893, ace. See also Washington Lrigation Co. V. Krutz, 119 Fed. Rep. (C C. A. ) SECT. IV. ] MEGDIRE V. CORWINE. 483 MEGUIRE V. CORWINE. Supreme Court o...f the United States, October Teem, 1879. {Reported in 101 United States, 108. ] Error to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. Frederick P. Stanton^ for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Enoch Totten^ for the defendant in error. Mr, Justice Swayne delivered the opinion of the court: — The plaintiff in the court below is the plaintiff in error here. The first count of the declaration avers that in consideration of the assistance to be rendered by him to the defendants' testator in procur- ing him to be appointed special counsel of the United States in certain litigated cases known as the " Farragut prize cases, " and also in con- sideration of the assistance to be rendered by the plaintiff in managing and carrying on the defence in those cases, — which assistance was accordingly rendered, — the testator promised the plaintiff to pay him one half of all fees which the testator should receive as such special counsel, and that the testator did receive as such special counsel in those cases $29, 950, of which sum the plaintiff was entitled to be paid one half, &c.
User Reviews: