Effects of Fiscal Year 1996 Funding On the National Labor Relations Board Hear
Effects of Fiscal Year 1996 Funding On the National Labor Relations Board Hear
Health And Human Services United States Congress Senate Committee On Appr
The book Effects of Fiscal Year 1996 Funding On the National Labor Relations Board Hear was written by author Health And Human Services United States Congress Senate Committee On Appr Here you can read free online of Effects of Fiscal Year 1996 Funding On the National Labor Relations Board Hear book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Effects of Fiscal Year 1996 Funding On the National Labor Relations Board Hear a good or bad book?
What reading level is Effects of Fiscal Year 1996 Funding On the National Labor Relations Board Hear book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
As a result, those cases that do go to trial are among the most difficult factually and legally. In summary, the raw numbers of elections, complaints and Board decisions are not the sole measures of the NLRB's resource needs. Less complex representation cases have been more than overtaken by more complex unfair labor practice cases and the number of Board decisions in any year is a small fraction of the Agency's caseload. The measure of our need for resources is a reduction in real budget value... of about 19% since 1985, a reduction of staff of about 25% since 1985, no reduction in our caseload in that time; and an ever increasing complexity in the casework we are called upon to handle. Question. Current figures show that 11-12% of America's workers are unionized. Why, then, does the NLRB need 33 regional offices while agencies that serve a higher percentage of workers, like OSHA and the Wage and Hour &7 97 Division, have only 10 and 8 regional offices respectively? Is it your contention that none of the 33 offices can be eliminated to save money?
User Reviews: