Illinois Appellate Court Unpublished Opinions: Second Series Ill. App.2d.V.132
The book Illinois Appellate Court Unpublished Opinions: Second Series Ill. App.2d.V.132 was written by author Illinois Appellate Court Here you can read free online of Illinois Appellate Court Unpublished Opinions: Second Series Ill. App.2d.V.132 book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Illinois Appellate Court Unpublished Opinions: Second Series Ill. App.2d.V.132 a good or bad book?
What reading level is Illinois Appellate Court Unpublished Opinions: Second Series Ill. App.2d.V.132 book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
App. 2d 446, 240 N.E. 2d 417 (1968) . In his second contention, defendant asserts that the trial court erred by refusing to take judicial notice of the meaning of the amount of alcohol in the deceased's bloodstream. We do not agree. VJhile a court may take judicial notice of that which everyone knows to be true. People v. Tassone , 41 111. 2d 7, 241 N.E. 2d 419 (1968), cert , denied , 394 U.S. 965 (1969), v;e 'do not believe that the fact in question here is a matter of common knowledge. The ef...fect of alcohol upon all persons is not the - same, Osborn v. Leuffg e n , 381 111. 295, 45 N.E. 2d 622 (1942), and the trial judge was obviously av;are of this when he refused to take judicial notice and suggested that defense counsel could introduce expert testimony on the point. Moreover, the statutory presumption of intoxication under the Motor Vehicle Act is related to the State's promotion of highway safety and, therefore, has 53960-54427 no application to this case. Defendant also contc^jds that.
You can download books for free in various formats, such as epub, pdf, azw, mobi, txt and others on book networks site. Additionally, the entire text is available for online reading through our e-reader. Our site is not responsible for the performance of third-party products (sites).
User Reviews: