Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1916-20
The book Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1916-20 was written by author Here you can read free online of Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1916-20 book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1916-20 a good or bad book?
Where can I read Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1916-20 for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1916-20 Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1916-20
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1916-20 Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1916-20
What reading level is Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1916-20 book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
Therein I said: "In my opinion, as I read the section, in order to constitute a valid claim against the City and County of San Francisco, the fugitive must be actually returned.
The proviso in Section 1557 was simply added by the Legis- lature to limit the liability of the State and not to impose liability upon the several accounts of the State exoept in so far as the wording of the Section would impose such liability. It is not for me to read in to -3- 87 Section 1557 language there not employ...ed and in the case under consideration, it certainly cannot he said that the City and County of San Francisco would he liahle for the expenses of Detective Kracke for the ohvious reason that the fugitive Mara was not returned.
The meaning of the Section is that when the fugitive is returned and placed on trial the ohligation to pay the expenses rests upon the State; when the fugitive is re- turned and not placed on trial, the ohligation is imposed on the county asking the requisition; hut when the fugitive is neither returned nor placed on trial, there is no liability against either the State or County." You are advised therefore, if it is shown to your Honorable Board that a requisition was regularly issued by the Governor of this State to the Governor of the State of Washington for the return of said Gurley from said State to the City and County of San Francisco, and that Gurley was returned to this City and County, that the claim presented, if for the proper amount, is, under the provisions of Section 1557 of the Political Code, a proper charge and claim against the City and County of San Fran- cisco.
What to read after Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1916-20?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by San Francisco (Calif.). City Attorney's Office to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
Therein I said: "In my opinion, as I read the section, in order to constitute a valid claim against the City and County of San Francisco, the fugitive must be actually returned.
The proviso in Section 1557 was simply added by the Legis- lature to limit the liability of the State and not to impose liability upon the several accounts of the State exoept in so far as the wording of the Section would impose such liability. It is not for me to read in to -3- 87 Section 1557 language there not employ...ed and in the case under consideration, it certainly cannot he said that the City and County of San Francisco would he liahle for the expenses of Detective Kracke for the ohvious reason that the fugitive Mara was not returned.
The meaning of the Section is that when the fugitive is returned and placed on trial the ohligation to pay the expenses rests upon the State; when the fugitive is re- turned and not placed on trial, the ohligation is imposed on the county asking the requisition; hut when the fugitive is neither returned nor placed on trial, there is no liability against either the State or County." You are advised therefore, if it is shown to your Honorable Board that a requisition was regularly issued by the Governor of this State to the Governor of the State of Washington for the return of said Gurley from said State to the City and County of San Francisco, and that Gurley was returned to this City and County, that the claim presented, if for the proper amount, is, under the provisions of Section 1557 of the Political Code, a proper charge and claim against the City and County of San Fran- cisco.
What to read after Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1916-20?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by San Francisco (Calif.). City Attorney's Office to read onlineMoreLess
Read book Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1916-20 for free
You can download books for free in various formats, such as epub, pdf, azw, mobi, txt and others on book networks site. Additionally, the entire text is available for online reading through our e-reader. Our site is not responsible for the performance of third-party products (sites).
Write Review:
Guest
Read Also
8 / 10
User Reviews: