Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1949 Pt.1
The book Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1949 Pt.1 was written by author San Francisco (Calif.). City Attorney's Office Here you can read free online of Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1949 Pt.1 book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1949 Pt.1 a good or bad book?
What reading level is Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1949 Pt.1 book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
Ocean City, 62 N.J.L. 160, and Cakley v. Atlantic ritj, 65 K.J.L. 127, 130 are informative on this subject. These eases state as follows! "By the return it appears that the ordinance, after its final passage by city council, was vetoed by the mayor and thereafter was adopted over the mayor's veto by a vote of five to one. This re-adoption is said by the prosecutor to be inefficacious because the statute, from which Ocean City derives its organic law, provides that after the veto of an ordl lano...a it shall be reconsidered, 'and if, on reconsideration, it shall pass the co mon council by a vote of two- thirds, it shall take effect notwithstanding suoh objection.* The argument upon thia point is thus #5 "•taUd by eounaeli »The reconsldaratlon of an ordlnanct makes It of no affeet, and at If It had navar baan put upon Its paaaagaj and It must ba taken up da novo and read and oonsldarad anew, accordingly.' This eonBtruotlon of the statutory law arises from and la based upon the effect given by parliamentary usaj^e to a vote » to reconsider.
User Reviews: