Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1961 Pt.1
The book Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1961 Pt.1 was written by author San Francisco (Calif.). City Attorney's Office Here you can read free online of Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1961 Pt.1 book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1961 Pt.1 a good or bad book?
What reading level is Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1961 Pt.1 book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
OPINION Answer to Question 1 . I have previously expressed my opinion that the Redevelopment Agency is a State agency entitled to exemption from taxes pursuant to Article XIII, Section 1, of the California Constitution. (City Attorney's Opinion No. 772, dated January I8, IS'5^. see, also. City Attorney's Opinion No. 7S8, March 8. 1^5^^ and Attorney General's Opinion No. 51-9 -- July 17^ 1951-) OPINION NO. 1529 Pprll 10, 1S61 i-age 2 Corollary to its tax exemption entitlement Is the Agency's rig...ht to cancellation of taxes as provided by law. (Section 4^86, Revenue and Taxation Code, formerly Section 3804a, Political Code.) The request for cancellation of taxes on the property which has been acquired by the Redevelopment Agency in the Diamond Heights and V/estern Addition projects covers taxes for the following years: 1S56-57, IS 57-58, 1958-59, 1959-60, and 1,.60-61. Until September I8, 1959, Section 4986 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provided in part as follows: "All or any portion of any uncollected tax, penalty, or costs, heretofore or hereafter levied, may, on satisfactory proof, be canceled by the auditor on order of the board of supervisors .
User Reviews: