The book Pleading And Practice in the Courts of Chancery was written by author Barton, R. T. (Robert Thomas), 1842-1917 Here you can read free online of Pleading And Practice in the Courts of Chancery book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Pleading And Practice in the Courts of Chancery a good or bad book?
What reading level is Pleading And Practice in the Courts of Chancery book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
Price, &c., 2 Paige, 333; Bobinson, &c. v. Smith, &c., 3 Paige, 231; WendeU v. Wendell, &o., 3 Paige, 509. See Bosher v. K. & H. Land Co., 89 Va. 457. A bill by a number of stockbolders against a corporation, alleging fraud in obtaining subscriptions, &c., was held not multifarious, because each complainant set forth a different claim. Carey et cd v. Coffee Stemming Machine Co., Va.; 20 S. E. K. 778; Bader v. Bristol Land Co., 94 Va. 766. But a bUl in equity was held bad, as multifarious, when'... it showed that the complainants' in- terests were antagonistic, as where creditors and stockholders united in the bill ask- ing for a cancellation of subscriptions to stock as to the stockholders, and an enforce- ment of the same as to the creditors. Brown et al v. Bedford City Land & Imp. Co., 91 Va. 31; Nunally v. Strauss, 94 Va. 255. "Whether or not a bill is multifarious depends upon its allegations and not upon its prayer." Not multifarious when the matters of litigation can be properly embraced in one suit and the rights of all parties be conveniently settled and the defendants suffer no prejudice.
You can download books for free in various formats, such as epub, pdf, azw, mobi, txt and others on book networks site. Additionally, the entire text is available for online reading through our e-reader. Our site is not responsible for the performance of third-party products (sites).
User Reviews: