Seven-Month-Olds' Display of Anticipatory Heart Rate Decelerations in An S1+ /s1- Fixed Fore-Period Paradigm
Seven-Month-Olds' Display of Anticipatory Heart Rate Decelerations in An S1+ /s1- Fixed Fore-Period Paradigm
Donohue, Robert L.
The book Seven-Month-Olds' Display of Anticipatory Heart Rate Decelerations in An S1+ /s1- Fixed Fore-Period Paradigm was written by author Donohue, Robert L. Here you can read free online of Seven-Month-Olds' Display of Anticipatory Heart Rate Decelerations in An S1+ /s1- Fixed Fore-Period Paradigm book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Seven-Month-Olds' Display of Anticipatory Heart Rate Decelerations in An S1+ /s1- Fixed Fore-Period Paradigm a good or bad book?
What reading level is Seven-Month-Olds' Display of Anticipatory Heart Rate Decelerations in An S1+ /s1- Fixed Fore-Period Paradigm book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
Donohue and Berg hypothesized the delay in omission responding to be the result of the more complicated nature of the trials used in their study. As in the present study, the S2 onset and offset of the Donohue and Berg study occurred in the midst of an ongoing SI. Given the similar nature of the trials and stimuli used in the two studies, I expected a late display of an omission to reoccur. The unexpected significant omission response on trial 8 may be attributable to the shorter ISI used here.... This shorter interval may facilitate the timing of the S1-S2 interval and lead to the display of an expectancy effect earlier in the experimental session. Perhaps more difficult to explain is the absence of a significant response to S2 omission on trial 19. It is not readily explained by a lack of interest in the S2 late in the session as there was little decline in the HR response to its presence. Neither is it readily explained by the shorter ISI used here. Given the unexpected pattern of the omission response displayed here, this result should be interpreted cautiously.
User Reviews: