The Texas Criminal Reports : Cases Argued And Adjudged in the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas ..
The Texas Criminal Reports : Cases Argued And Adjudged in the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas ..
Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals
The book The Texas Criminal Reports : Cases Argued And Adjudged in the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas .. was written by author Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals Here you can read free online of The Texas Criminal Reports : Cases Argued And Adjudged in the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas .. book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is The Texas Criminal Reports : Cases Argued And Adjudged in the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas .. a good or bad book?
What reading level is The Texas Criminal Reports : Cases Argued And Adjudged in the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas .. book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
HENDERSON, Judge. — This case was affirmed at a former day of this term, and now comes before us on motion for rehearing. A majority of the court believe that the testimony of the State's witness to the effect that when he approached where defendant and the jennet were in the lane, defendant was cracking the jennet, was not admissible ; and the court below erred in allowing it to be introduced as it was an opinion and conclusion of the witness. The writer does not agree to Digitized by LjOOQ IC... 396 49 Texas Criminal Reports. IDallas, this, but believes that the testimony was admissible as stated in the original opinion. A re-examination of the bill of exceptions taken to the action of the court in excluding the testimony of the father of appellant, to the effect that he was familiar with the jennet in question and her size; that she was a large jennet, and that he knew the size and height of the defendant, and that with his knowledge of the size and height of the jennet and height of defendant, that the defendant could not have copulated with said jennet standing on level ground, — has con- vinced us that the bill is comprehensive enough to raise the question as to • the action of the court in excluding the same.
User Reviews: